*Suicide directly involving only the deceased person is not by itself a criminal offence under Scots Law and has not been in recent history. However, attempting suicide might be a Breach of the peace if it is not done as a private act; this is routinely reported in the case of persons threatening suicide in areas frequented by the public. The Suicide Act 1961 applies only to England and Wales but under Scots Law a person who assists a suicide might be charged with murder, culpable homicide, or no offence depending upon the facts of each case. Despite not being a criminal offence, consequential liability upon the person attempting suicide (or if successful, his/her estate) might arise under civil law where e.g. it parallels the civil liabilities recognised in the (English Law) Reeves case…
18 thoughts on “THERE ARE SOME CHARMLESS TORY CANDIDATES”
I am reminded of a quote about Tories that describes them as born with some essential part of their soul missing. I’m sure it doesn’t originate with Charlie Brooker, but in an article in the Guardian in 2007 he described the Conservative party in the following terms: “The Conservative party is an eternally irritating force for wrong that appeals exclusively to bigots, toffs, money-minded machine men, faded entertainers and selfish, grasping simpletons who were born with some essential part of their soul missing.”
Normally, you’d think that adding “Esquire” to your name was just a bit of twitter fun. In this case, I’m quite convinced he really does think he has attained a high social rank and should have the corresponding title. It’s up to the electorate to decide if that is true. What a charmer.
Was going to ask him about that on twitter but he’s protected his tweets. I could follow him but I don’t want to get badgered by twitter’s not-so-smart algorithms to follow Nick Griffin for the next year and a half.
Well, Terry, we shall have to ensure we afford him the rank of Esquire whenever we refer to him.
One day he might be promoted to royalty, although I don’t think they are allowed to choose not to have children, unlike Mr Esquire person here. Still, as we keep them, and they don’t have to worry about the expense thereof, I suppose that does put them into another category. Oh never mind me, I’m rambling.
I am reminded of a quote about Tories that describes them as born with some essential part of their soul missing. I’m sure it doesn’t originate with Charlie Brooker, but in an article in the Guardian in 2007 he described the Conservative party in the following terms: “The Conservative party is an eternally irritating force for wrong that appeals exclusively to bigots, toffs, money-minded machine men, faded entertainers and selfish, grasping simpletons who were born with some essential part of their soul missing.”
Well, you can’t say fairer than that, guv.
Here’s the URL of the article, which I think has worn rather well over the years. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/apr/02/comment.conservatives
LikeLiked by 2 people
Splendid article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Donald Gatt Esq, (an ex-UKIPPER, I believe) might feel very different if it was him or someone close to him that was involved.”
Salaried, or by the hour?
LikeLiked by 1 person
That one’s gone over my head, Conan.
Maybe it’s because you wrote in English 🙂
LikeLike
Meretrix sive scortum?
That phrase will lick you in the face and play dead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
EEEEK….
LikeLike
Normally, you’d think that adding “Esquire” to your name was just a bit of twitter fun. In this case, I’m quite convinced he really does think he has attained a high social rank and should have the corresponding title. It’s up to the electorate to decide if that is true. What a charmer.
LikeLike
Was going to ask him about that on twitter but he’s protected his tweets. I could follow him but I don’t want to get badgered by twitter’s not-so-smart algorithms to follow Nick Griffin for the next year and a half.
LikeLike
You mean you don’t already follow Mr Griffin?
LikeLike
I only follow Nick Griffin for the gardening tips. Honest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I expect he knows a deal about manure?
LikeLike
Well, Terry, we shall have to ensure we afford him the rank of Esquire whenever we refer to him.
One day he might be promoted to royalty, although I don’t think they are allowed to choose not to have children, unlike Mr Esquire person here. Still, as we keep them, and they don’t have to worry about the expense thereof, I suppose that does put them into another category. Oh never mind me, I’m rambling.
LikeLike
Maybe he thinks people called Donald are destined for greatness.
He was most definitely a member of UKIP
https://whocanivotefor.co.uk/person/2050/donald-gatt
right up until 2014
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13158781.Scottish_Ukip_candidate_slams_party_s__petty__childish__bitching_/
The Tory Party seem to be the place of refuge for ‘kippers these days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, with the example of the orange one, who could blame him… and who knows, maybe he is right.
After all here he is starring in an article in Munguin’s Republic. How much greater could he want?
LikeLike
Hah, his UKIP campaign slogan was “Scotland needs a radical alternative …” so he joined the Tory Party. First class clown.
Click to access sample_catalogue_-_election_ephermera.pdf
LikeLiked by 1 person
He really needs a prize for that!
LikeLike
It’s a pity Donalds dad didn’t use Durex.
LikeLike
LOL
LikeLike